Is crypto dead, or is there hope for 2026? With Jordi Alexander and Zaheer Ebtikar

The narrative surrounding cryptocurrency often oscillates violently between revolutionary fervor and outright obsolescence. Following the severe market contractions of 2022 and 2023, coupled with high-profile institutional failures and increasing regulatory scrutiny, the persistent question—’Is crypto dead?’—has gained renewed prominence. However, a deeper analysis, particularly among seasoned investors and infrastructure specialists like Jordi Alexander and Zaheer Ebtikar, suggests that this perception of death is merely the necessary cleansing phase preceding substantial, sustainable growth targeted toward 2026.

The ‘Dead’ Case: Fatigue and Regulatory Headwinds

The pessimism stems from several areas: rampant speculation being liquidated, the erosion of trust following events like the collapse of FTX, and the ongoing uncertainty surrounding global regulatory frameworks. Critics argue that crypto failed to deliver on promises of widespread, frictionless utility, remaining largely a niche investment vehicle. For many casual investors burned by volatility, the current state feels definitively post-mortem.

The Hope for 2026: Maturity and Infrastructure

Jordi Alexander, known for his pragmatic views on market cycles and infrastructure investment, argues that the bear market successfully flushed out ‘tourists’ and unsustainable, zero-sum protocols. The surviving ecosystem is fundamentally stronger, focusing on genuine utility rather than mere hype. Alexander’s perspective often centers on the importance of robust DeFi protocols that can withstand economic pressure, setting the stage for institutional adoption.

Zaheer Ebtikar, focusing on the technological foundation, highlights the massive strides made in scalability and efficiency that are critical for mass adoption by 2026. The shift from congested Layer 1 networks to highly efficient Layer 2 solutions (e.g., optimistic and ZK rollups) is preparing the rails for real-world enterprise use cases. Ebtikar’s focus remains on the core infrastructure needed to onboard billions of users and integrate seamlessly with traditional finance (TradFi) and corporate operations—a critical prerequisite for the next major growth cycle.

Two key drivers support the optimistic 2026 outlook:

1. Institutional Integration: The maturation of regulatory compliant tokenization projects and the potential approval of widespread financial products (like spot ETFs) are bridging the gap between TradFi and crypto. By 2026, regulated institutional capital is expected to flow far more freely, supporting higher market valuations based on asset utility rather than pure speculation.

2. Real-World Assets (RWA) and Utility: The shift towards tokenizing real-world assets—from real estate to private credit—provides concrete, tangible value propositions. By 2026, the utility of blockchain technology will be less about revolutionary currency and more about efficiency gains in established industries.

Conclusion

Crypto is not dead; rather, the speculative fever of 2021 has subsided, replaced by the sober work of building resilient infrastructure. The consensus among serious industry figures is that 2024 and 2025 will be years of consolidation and infrastructure build-out, capitalizing on the groundwork laid during the bear market. By 2026, driven by genuine utility, scalable technology refined by experts like Ebtikar, and institutional confidence championed by analysts like Alexander, the market is positioned to enter a new, more mature phase of growth, making the current ‘death’ narrative profoundly misplaced.

Source: Is crypto dead, or is there hope for 2026? With Jordi Alexander and Zaheer Ebtikar